Just before the 2010 ESRI UC got cooking this year, this press release from ESRI hit the street. In short, ESRI is announcing that they'll be going beyond the ELA-only licensing of ArcGIS Server for the Amazon Web Services cloud. What is apparent that there is a two-pronged licensing arrangement here where you still bring your own license to the cloud but if you're not an ELA customer, you can "lease" a license on 1, 3, or 12 month terms.
In my mind this is a very good thing because without this option, ESRI was cutting off a potentially large business segment of non-ELA customers as well as short circuiting the scalability and flexibility options of the cloud. How do I ramp up capacity if I can't do a short term software lease?
Clearly there will be some "glass half empty" folks who want to buy ArcGIS Server on an hourly basis but the flexible short term options are a start and very big step in the right direction.
Some outstanding questions and issues that will likely come to light over the next few weeks:
- No word yet on pricing.
- I assume short term lease options will roll in the cost of the AMI, but no final word on that yet
- If I'm a company hosting client sites and am using the cloud as my hosting platform, am I subject to ASP licensing costs or can I just pay the normal server license fee?
- Is the 12 month lease done at the traditional server license costs annually (no maintenance option) or will it be the traditional license model of up front cost plus maintenance?
I've got questions on these and other issues into the ESRI folks presently. More to follow as the story evolves.